## Could our universe be a cyclic buffer that repeats itself every Infinity Years?

### Maybe It's the ultimate answer to the theory of the Big Crunch

Let’s define the settings: we will always consider a measure-preserving system , meaning that is a probability space and is a measurable transformation that preserves :If , then there exists such that . This is easy to see because the family , , satisfies a

*stationary condition*

So, if , two of the sets have positive-measure intersection. In fact, if this is not the case, then

a contradiction. We then get the original Poincaré’s Recurrence Theorem:

Theorem 1 (PRT)If , then there exists such that .

This proves more: call a setRemark 1The modern statements of PRT are: if , then a.e. point returns to . This means that , which obviously implies the above theorem.

*syndetic*if it has bounded gaps, i.e., if there exists such that .

For further discussions about PRT, the reader may consult this paper of Vitaly Bergelson. Altought its simplicity, this is a remarkable result. It implies, for example, that almost every has infinitely many ‘s in its decimal representation, and the same happens for any finite sequence of digits.Exercise 1Prove that if , then the set is syndetic.

As preserves , it defines a unitary operator on the Hilbert space by , for simplicity denoted from now on as . With this notation, if , then

where is the inner product in , so

such that the sequence , , may give more general results than PRT. This is what happens.

This theorem, also known as Mean Ergodic Theorem, is in fact a spectral theoretical result and a more general version holds, given byTheorem 2(Von Neumann) If , then the sequence , , converges in .

Theorem 3If is a unitary operator on a Hilbert space , then the sequence of operators , , converges pointwise in norm to the orthogonal projection onto the subspace of -fixed elements .

*Proof:*When is unitary, . From the general orthogonal decomposition

we obtain

For , the convergence is obvious. If , then

By approximation and applying the triangle inequality, the same happens in , which concludes the proof.

Let’s show how to use these convergences to obtain recurrence results.Remark 2Being, as we said, Hilbertian in nature, Theorem 2 also holds when .

Exercise 2Under the same conditions of Theorem 3, prove that the same conclusion happens for a sequence such that .

Note that satisfies the above conditions.Proposition 4Let be such that . Then and .

*Proof:*Consider the function . Then and . Because minimizes the distance of to , we have . In addition, if we had , then , such that . Integrating, we conclude

a contradiction.

So, expressions of the type , from now on calledExercise 3Using the above proposition, prove that if , then the set is syndetic. (Hint: if , then converges to as.)

*ergodic averages*, are important when dealing with recurrence. This will be our main interest in the next posts. For another perspective on Von Neumann’s Theorem and related results, the reader is referred to this Terence Tao’s lecture.

## 0 Comments::

## Post a Comment

Hope you enjoyed :)